Header graphic for print
Real Property & Development Review

Monthly Archives: October 2006

Supreme Court Rules for Contractor in “Scoccolo” Case

Posted in Construction

Well, that settles that…or does it?  Today the Supreme Court issued its decision in the long-running dispute dispute between Scoccolo Construction and the City of Renton – a complete victory for the contractor.  Justice Madsen’s concurring opinion, however, raises legitimate questions on just how precedential today’s decision is. This site previewed the Scoccolo case back… Continue Reading

Preston Gates Exonerated in Malpractice Case

Posted in Construction

A former client sued Preston Gates for $1.7 million related to the "nightmare" associated with the client’s retirement home in Kitsap County.  The client alleged the problems which lead him to sell the home – primarily cost overruns & insufficient insurance recovery available to the builder which was doing business as an LLC — were due to… Continue Reading

Defect Claim under UCC Allowed to Proceed

Posted in Construction

On a school renovation project, the general contractor hired a subcontractor to apply stain to a newly installed concrete floor which had been sealed with a silicone product specified by the architect.  The stain failed to adhere — washing off after an accidental water spill.  After settling with the owner and subcontractor, the general contractor… Continue Reading

Supreme Court Sides with L&I on Ergonomics Dispute

Posted in Construction

We previewed the ergonomics case in this prior post.  Today the Supreme Court voted 8-1 in favor of allowing L&I to proceed with ergonomics-related investigations under the general duty clause of WISHA.  The employer, supported by the industry, had contended that Initiative 841 passed in 2001 essentially preempted this general authority.  The case is now… Continue Reading

Oregon Supreme Court Widens Arbitration Clause to Include Resolution of “Conditions” to Arbitration

Posted in Construction

There’s a lot to chew on in this recent Oregon Supreme Court case arising from a $2.6 million delay and disruption claim, and the basic proposition relied on by the Court is nothing new:  arbitration clauses will be broadly applied and, in case of doubt, all disputes potentially within the scope of the arbitration clause… Continue Reading