Header graphic for print
Real Property & Development Review

Monthly Archives: April 2007

Court Rejects Opinion Testimony Offered by Prof. Nash

Posted in Construction

Characterizing his expert report as “legal argument dressed as expert testimony”, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims held that Prof. Ralph Nash of Georgetown University, a leading government contracts expert and prolific author, won’t be permitted to testify as to his legal opinions in a patent infringement case.  The opinion contains an excellent summary of the… Continue Reading

Court Orders Roof Removal

Posted in Land Use

Based on a deed restriction allowing only a "one story" home, the Court of Appeals held that the owner in this case would be required to "abate" — tear out and modify — the roof of a home that blocked westerly views from an upland parcel in West Seattle. Our previous coverage of this case… Continue Reading

Late Notice Bars Coverage for Condo Defect Damages

Posted in Construction

Division 1 not only barred coverage due to late notice in this case — a hard enough feat under Washington’s relatively liberal test for deciding whether a failure to comply with an insurance policy’s notice clause will forfeit the insured’s rights — but it did so on summary judgment. So what was the prejudice to… Continue Reading

Leasehold Lien Upheld in Bremerton Ice Arena Case

Posted in Construction

Division 2 holds in this case that a subcontractor has the right to lien site improvements under RCW 60.04.010 even though the underlying real property is nonlienable public property. The case arose from a failed effort to build an ice arena in Bremerton.  The City owned the land and hired a developer to build the… Continue Reading

Why Contractors Fail

Posted in Construction

ENR is out with a new article summarizing research by FMI on why contractors fail.  The research focuses in particular on the "psychology of contractor failure" and identifies certain red flags of potential failure.  One red flag, according to the study: a contractor executive who proclaims "we’re right and we’ll prove it in court."  … Continue Reading

Government Allowed to Prosecute Fraud Counterclaim

Posted in Construction

Taking the offensive against a claim it believed to be knowingly false, the USDOT in this case arising from a roadway project in Eastern Washington filed a counterclaim against the contractor under three federal statutes — the False Claims Act, the the anti-fraud provisions of the Contract Disputes Act and the Forfeiture of Fraudulent Claims Act…. Continue Reading

Registration Bond Not Liable for Unpaid Premiums

Posted in Construction

Is a contractor’s registration bond liable for the premiums the contractor is supposed to pay to maintain its workers compensation insurance?  The Alaska Supreme Court said no in a case that contains an interesting overview of of what’s covered and not covered by such bonds.