The prevailing party fee clause in this case said that fees would be awarded in connection with any action to collect sums due. What about prevailing on a motion to compel arbitration to decide the debt collection dispute — is that enough to trigger the fee clause? The Supreme Court said no — legal fees are not yet due because the merits of the case had not yet been decided — and thus vacated an award of fees which had been granted to Belfor USA in a dispute with an owner. The Court hinted the outcome might have changed if the clause had been written differently (i.e., awarding fees to the prevailing party for enforcing a contractual term).
Copy of opinion (Belfor v. Thiel) also available here Download file